Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] - User Scheduler pods run on user nodes preventing scale down on Azure #2406

Closed
Adam-D-Lewis opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[BUG] - User Scheduler pods run on user nodes preventing scale down on Azure #2406

Adam-D-Lewis opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
provider: Azure type: bug 🐛 Something isn't working

Comments

@Adam-D-Lewis
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug

User Scheduler pods run on user nodes preventing scale down on Azure

Expected behavior

User nodes should be able to scale down to 0

OS and architecture in which you are running Nebari

Linux x86-64

How to Reproduce the problem?

See above

Command output

No response

Versions and dependencies used.

No response

Compute environment

None

Integrations

No response

Anything else?

No response
@Adam-D-Lewis Adam-D-Lewis added type: bug 🐛 Something isn't working provider: Azure needs: triage 🚦 Someone needs to have a look at this issue and triage labels Apr 17, 2024
@viniciusdc
Copy link
Contributor

@Adam-D-Lewis can we include this as a subtask of #2414

@Adam-D-Lewis
Copy link
Member Author

@viniciusdc good catch. I'll close this in favor of #2414

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from New 🚦 to Done 💪🏾 in 🪴 Nebari Project Management Apr 19, 2024
@Adam-D-Lewis Adam-D-Lewis removed the needs: triage 🚦 Someone needs to have a look at this issue and triage label Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
provider: Azure type: bug 🐛 Something isn't working
Projects
🪴 Nebari Project Management
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Adam-D-Lewis @viniciusdc