Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dual token model enhancement #1477

Closed
vang1ong7ang opened this issue Mar 16, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

dual token model enhancement #1477

vang1ong7ang opened this issue Mar 16, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
Discussion Initial issue state - proposed but not yet accepted

Comments

@vang1ong7ang
Copy link
Contributor

vang1ong7ang commented Mar 16, 2020

However, the problem is that, the low demand of GAS makes GAS valueless, and easily been controlled in the market and exchanges by attackers. Currently there are not enough on-chain transactions which need a lot of GAS. Almost the only thing that a governance participant can to when it obtains a GAS is to sell it. Then, more want to sell it but less want to buy it. GAS becomes valueless. As a result, governance participants can not get enough reward if the price of GAS is too low.

In this article, solution will be proposed to solve the GAS dilemma.

https://github.com/vang1ong7ang/DualTokenModel


NOTICE

Such dual token model enhancement never introduce any real benefit or performance improvement to neo network. It is only a game to make GAS holders benefit more and make the value of GAS sustainable.


@vang1ong7ang vang1ong7ang added the Discussion Initial issue state - proposed but not yet accepted label Mar 16, 2020
@wulalablalbalba
Copy link

Very delicate tokeneconoy module

@Tommo-L
Copy link
Contributor

Tommo-L commented Mar 16, 2020

Maybe let Caesar's be Caesar's, and god's be god's. GAS is just used as a payment token, NEO's gains come from the increased transaction volume. 🤣

@erikzhang
Copy link
Member

It makes no sense that introducing a complex mechanism into the system but not produced any practical value. In my opinion this is more like a trick.

@vncoelho
Copy link
Member

@erikzhang one of the points @vang1ong7ang mentions is to incentive those who hold GAS. In fact, these are interesting things to consider.

We should improve the model in my opnion.
#1468

Lets merge the good points and move to a promissing model.

@erikzhang
Copy link
Member

to incentive those who hold GAS.

#1430 is going to incentive those who hold GAS.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Initial issue state - proposed but not yet accepted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants