-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cannot use prototype as @process #7
Comments
You can do
|
@kdambekalns @Sebobo How about a syntax like this:
This would allow to separate afx-attributes from expression and string attributes. Another use case would be:
|
Personally I dislike the tag/prototype in an attribute style. JSX also doesn't allow it I think. Just found out some days ago that XSL also does it the same way as AFX does it now. Have a child tag and apply its result to an attribute of the parent. |
JSX would allow you to do this UPDATE: I was wrong jsx does'nt allow this yet |
|
Still don't like how the code looks when tags are contained in attributes. |
@Sebobo JSX allows jsx in attributes like this:
In this regard it would make sense to allow an expression to contain afx again maybe like this:
|
could be solved by my afx in eel approach similar to jsx: #28 (comment) |
All of these do not work:
But this would work in "pure" Fusion:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: