Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable linking circuits based on a common circuit service group #130

Closed
ryanmerolle opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Enable linking circuits based on a common circuit service group #130

ryanmerolle opened this issue Jun 29, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@ryanmerolle
Copy link
Contributor

Circuits seems to be specifically focused on a single end, but there is no way to link circuits tied to a single "service group." A service group would be 1 or many circuits.

@mdlayher mdlayher changed the title [Enhancement] Link circuits based on a common circuit service group Enable linking circuits based on a common circuit service group Jun 30, 2016
@rkwl1
Copy link

rkwl1 commented Jul 12, 2016

Circuits should be able to link the A and Z location. Also a field for cross connect provider, as those can change from datacenter to datacenter.

@ryanmerolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep as the feature states this would be achieved given some sort of service group. Service groups allow for not just A to Z, but A through Z and some.

@bsakdol
Copy link

bsakdol commented Nov 30, 2016

Just my two cents, since I was looking for this exact feature... The A to Z link of a circuit is what I was originally looking for, but I could certainly see how a service group would be more generally beneficial, since multi-point connections could be grouped together in this way. Either way, it would be great to see this feature added.

@alexjhart
Copy link
Contributor

I was looking to solve connecting two ends of a circuit today and found this service group issue would likely solve that. I wonder if this is more of a short term feature request or more of a long term roadmap type item? I see it has been open for several months, yet has the minor feature tag.

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

#49 has been completed to allow for both the A and Z sides of a circuit to be defined (this will be available in v1.8.0). I'm going to close this issue out as it seems to overlap heavily with this feature. Adding a mechanism for grouping circuits seems like it would be redundant to the existing combination of provider and type.

@ryanmerolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

So how does this take care of carrier provided MPLS and VPLS circuits where there are multiple sides to a service?

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

Each circuit has only two endpoints, regardless of the type of service it carries.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 19, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants