Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for vertical racks #1310

Closed
tioan opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

support for vertical racks #1310

tioan opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@tioan
Copy link

tioan commented Jul 2, 2017

Issue type: feature request

please add support for vertical racks like this one

image

Rittal VerticalBox DK 7501.000

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

This feature request lacks sufficient detail to be actionable. Per the contributing guidelines:

When submitting a feature request on GitHub, be sure to include the following:

  • A detailed description of the proposed functionality
  • A use case for the feature; who would use it and what value it would add to NetBox
  • A rough description of changes necessary to the database schema (if applicable)
  • Any third-party libraries or other resources which would be involved

Please extend the request so that it meets all of these requirements. If no response is received within a week, this issue will be closed.

@tioan
Copy link
Author

tioan commented Jul 7, 2017

I think on the Editing rack Site a new checkbox "Vertical rack" like the "Descending units " checkbox is necessary.

grafik

If "Vertical rack" is activated please show under Rack and Rack Elevations an Rack with vertical Rack Units instead of horizontal Rack Units.

grafik

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

This seems like a very obscure requirement, and developing the markup/styling to render this type of elevation would require substantial effort. Given that you could alternatively just model it as a normal rack and add a note indicating that it's a vertical rack, I don't believe it's worth the investment of effort. But I'll leave this open for a while to see if anyone wants to take it on.

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application label Jul 7, 2017
@Gelob
Copy link
Contributor

Gelob commented Jul 9, 2017

What about just rotating the rack and resizing the width/height?

@bellwood
Copy link
Contributor

@Gelob: do you mean for the visual/rack representation? If so, as stated, the CSS involved to do that would be a major PITA and add basically zero to little value (sorry)

As @jeremystretch stated, perhaps a flag to just notate the rack rail orientation is horizontal vs vertical would suffice but at the end of the day, just add a rack that is 5U high and keep trucking

90* of physical rotation in the real world shouldn't require any change within the software IMHO, since a 5U rack would obviously not be a standard cabinet

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

I don't see any real benefit to adding a flag for this. A 5U rack is the same to NetBox whether it's standing up or on its side. Maybe this is a use case for free-form tags (#132).

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants