-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support for vertical racks #1310
Comments
This feature request lacks sufficient detail to be actionable. Per the contributing guidelines:
Please extend the request so that it meets all of these requirements. If no response is received within a week, this issue will be closed. |
This seems like a very obscure requirement, and developing the markup/styling to render this type of elevation would require substantial effort. Given that you could alternatively just model it as a normal rack and add a note indicating that it's a vertical rack, I don't believe it's worth the investment of effort. But I'll leave this open for a while to see if anyone wants to take it on. |
What about just rotating the rack and resizing the width/height? |
@Gelob: do you mean for the visual/rack representation? If so, as stated, the CSS involved to do that would be a major PITA and add basically zero to little value (sorry) As @jeremystretch stated, perhaps a flag to just notate the rack rail orientation is horizontal vs vertical would suffice but at the end of the day, just add a rack that is 5U high and keep trucking 90* of physical rotation in the real world shouldn't require any change within the software IMHO, since a 5U rack would obviously not be a standard cabinet |
I don't see any real benefit to adding a flag for this. A 5U rack is the same to NetBox whether it's standing up or on its side. Maybe this is a use case for free-form tags (#132). |
Issue type: feature request
please add support for vertical racks like this one
Rittal VerticalBox DK 7501.000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: