You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a boolean to indicate descending unit-numbering (implemented with #191). But once you change that flag for an existing rack all devices change their positions as well and the rack gets flipped upside-down (technically correct). Would it make sense to allow flipping rack-numbering once you toggle that boolean? And maybe to be able to mass-adjust numbering by +/- a few units, just in you figure out you missed to count as well one unit on the top or bottom as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been closed as it does not conform to one of the provided templates as required by the contributing guide. If you'd like to request that your issue be re-opened, please first update the content so that it matches the appropriate template (this may require rewriting your issue entirely).
There is a boolean to indicate descending unit-numbering (implemented with #191). But once you change that flag for an existing rack all devices change their positions as well and the rack gets flipped upside-down (technically correct). Would it make sense to allow flipping rack-numbering once you toggle that boolean? And maybe to be able to mass-adjust numbering by +/- a few units, just in you figure out you missed to count as well one unit on the top or bottom as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: