You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regions ( #164 ) are a very neat way of grouping sites, but they currently lack any informational fields beyond Name and nesting.
I think that adding Custom field capability to Regions would cover for most needs in that respect.
For example, some users might want to store Time Zone where the Region operates, or some other information (characterizing how hard it is to reach the region, for instance: regular, mountainous, polar, undersea, orbital, asteroid belt, gamma quadrant, etc).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Regions are secondary objects similar to rack groups and VLAN groups, which are used solely for the organization of primary objects. They aren't intended to store additional information. Rather, that information should be applies to sites directly.
Issue type: feature request
Regions ( #164 ) are a very neat way of grouping sites, but they currently lack any informational fields beyond Name and nesting.
I think that adding Custom field capability to Regions would cover for most needs in that respect.
For example, some users might want to store Time Zone where the Region operates, or some other information (characterizing how hard it is to reach the region, for instance: regular, mountainous, polar, undersea, orbital, asteroid belt, gamma quadrant, etc).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: