Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add preferStatic type to config #443

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

eduardoboucas
Copy link
Member

Which problem is this pull request solving?

Adds a new preferStatic type to the functions config.

Also, makes the path and schedule properties mutually exclusive.

Finally, it adds some JSDoc comments to each property.

@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas requested a review from a team as a code owner November 9, 2023 10:53
@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas merged commit 9abc987 into main Nov 9, 2023
6 checks passed
@eduardoboucas eduardoboucas deleted the feat/prefer-static-type branch November 9, 2023 11:00
eduardoboucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [2.4.0](v2.3.0...v2.4.0)
(2023-11-09)


### Features

* add `preferStatic` type to config
([#443](#443))
([9abc987](9abc987))


### Bug Fixes

* **deps:** update dependency @netlify/serverless-functions-api to
v1.10.0 ([#437](#437))
([9f0de91](9f0de91))
* **deps:** update dependency @netlify/serverless-functions-api to
v1.10.1 ([#438](#438))
([c8551b9](c8551b9))
* **deps:** update dependency @netlify/serverless-functions-api to
v1.11.0 ([#442](#442))
([d558f36](d558f36))
* **deps:** update dependency @netlify/serverless-functions-api to
v1.9.1 ([#434](#434))
([3f0b712](3f0b712))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: token-generator-app[bot] <82042599+token-generator-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants