Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NSMgr container restarts due to concurrent map writes #419

Closed
alitta-german opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #422
Closed

NSMgr container restarts due to concurrent map writes #419

alitta-german opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #422
Assignees

Comments

@alitta-german
Copy link

We've discovered that in some cases there are several restarts of the NSMgr container. We could not filter out a single scenario for reproduction, but in most of the cases, it happened when we've installed new Endpoints (NSEs, NSCs).

my-deployment-name-nsmgr-csg65-nsmgr-prev.txt:fatal error: concurrent map writes
my-deployment-name-nsmgr-lwrl8-nsmgr-prev.txt:fatal error: concurrent map writes
my-deployment-name-nsmgr-qzrzs-nsmgr-prev.txt:panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
my-deployment-name-nsmgr-qzrzs-nsmgr-prev.txt-[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x1b8 pc=0x906677]
NSMgr_logs.zip

The NSMgr version that we used was 5a4b013.

@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this to In Progress in Release 1.1.0 Nov 19, 2021
Repository owner moved this from In Progress to Done in Release 1.1.0 Nov 25, 2021
@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this from Done to Potentially fixed in Release 1.1.0 Nov 25, 2021
@denis-tingaikin
Copy link
Member

denis-tingaikin commented Nov 25, 2021

@alitta-german Should be fixed in the latest nsmgr. Be free to reopen this if the issue is still actual.

@denis-tingaikin denis-tingaikin moved this from Potentially fixed to Done in Release 1.1.0 Nov 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants