You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please use the 👍 reaction to show that you are affected by the same issue.
Please don't comment if you have no relevant information to add. It's just extra noise for everyone subscribed to this issue.
Subscribe to receive notifications on status change and new comments.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way to define a "weight" to a given card, representing the effort necessary to conclude it.
It should allow different units of measurements like: hours, decimal points, lists {S, M, L, XL,...}, Fibonacci {1, 3, 5, 8,...}
The author or the person assigned to the card should be able to modify its scale value (so people can discuss it somewhere else and update the card).
Describe alternatives you've considered
I could get close to it using tags, but only simple "size" lists would work like S, M, L...
Anything else becomes confuse and requires maintaining both lists of tags + cards.
Additional context
I'm not suggesting a full collaborative card scale definition tool here (but you hv my vote if you decide so). All I'm proposing is a placeholder (field or attribute) where the estimated workload of a card is registered by its author or the person it's assigned to.
I've made a sketch of what I believe represents my idea (in addition to #3660 )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ok. Tks for the feedback.
Glad to know there's something already in the pipeline for that matter.
If NC/Deck wants to compare with Trello, this is coming late to the discussion.
Just voted in favor of that then. Hope it helps.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way to define a "weight" to a given card, representing the effort necessary to conclude it.
It should allow different units of measurements like: hours, decimal points, lists {S, M, L, XL,...}, Fibonacci {1, 3, 5, 8,...}
The author or the person assigned to the card should be able to modify its scale value (so people can discuss it somewhere else and update the card).
Describe alternatives you've considered
I could get close to it using tags, but only simple "size" lists would work like S, M, L...
Anything else becomes confuse and requires maintaining both lists of tags + cards.
Additional context
I'm not suggesting a full collaborative card scale definition tool here (but you hv my vote if you decide so). All I'm proposing is a placeholder (field or attribute) where the estimated workload of a card is registered by its author or the person it's assigned to.
I've made a sketch of what I believe represents my idea (in addition to #3660 )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: