Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

graceful dealing with large files from user perspective #27285

Closed
petesimonic opened this issue May 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

graceful dealing with large files from user perspective #27285

petesimonic opened this issue May 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
0. Needs triage Pending check for reproducibility or if it fits our roadmap enhancement

Comments

@petesimonic
Copy link

Home user doesn't expect a limitation in half of their device/desktop/VPS/VM RAM for file upload. On the other hand they can posses or rent some big external storage device/service. And it's natural to want to use it for storage of drive images, which could range from installation media or DVD to virtualized HDDs, so it's from 4 GiB to 4 TiB. Common Nc host have less than 8 GiB RAM and none of them have 8 TiB.

So it would be highly reasonable to warn user through client apps, admin interfaces, and via documentation on the file-size that their instance is capable to put through. And to give people hints what to do if they need more performance (for example to recommend managed service, or system upgrade guidelines).

It would be magnificent solution to get rid of this limitation. But I'm not sure if it didn't make into the very core of whole system, and cannot be removed without deep update of arch and refactoring.

@petesimonic petesimonic added 0. Needs triage Pending check for reproducibility or if it fits our roadmap enhancement labels May 29, 2021
@kesselb
Copy link
Contributor

kesselb commented May 30, 2021

Closing in favor of #17992.

@kesselb kesselb closed this as completed May 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0. Needs triage Pending check for reproducibility or if it fits our roadmap enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants