You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
here is the result i get,seem doesnt better than ARIMA,the bold purple line is farer from the actual, is the reason of gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct?
plz,can you update the demo for new api,or instruct me how to improve the performance?or only use the text-davinci-003 or llama-70B to get the result plot in your paper?
Sorry for taking up your time. Can you give me some help in your free time?
:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's indeed unfortunate that OpenAI has deprecated text-davinci-003. As mentioned in the README, we found gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct to perform worse than text-davinci-003. We found using a lower temperature (e.g. 0.3) improved performance slightly but still not matching text-davinci-003. Therefore, we do not recommend using gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct as a drop-in replacement. Using other models such as LLaMA 2 will work much better.
Hi! Thank you for releasing the code! This is a very interesting piece of work. Congratsssss on the NeurIPS acceptance! 🎉
i met some problem when i use your code.
when directly run the demo.ipynb ,error here.
after check the openai's url, change this code:
to
here is the result i get,seem doesnt better than ARIMA,the bold purple line is farer from the actual, is the reason of gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct?
plz,can you update the demo for new api,or instruct me how to improve the performance?or only use the text-davinci-003 or llama-70B to get the result plot in your paper?
Sorry for taking up your time. Can you give me some help in your free time?
:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: