You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Will fMRIPrep incorporate NORDIC? If so, then there's no need to implement it in fMRIPost-Phase.
Does NORDIC meaningfully impact preprocessing (i.e., motion parameters, boldref space)? If so, then we really need it in fMRIPrep. Otherwise, we can apply it to the raw data in fMRIPost-Phase, then run STC, and then apply the transforms from fMRIPrep.
Even if we add NORDIC to fMRIPrep, it won't output processed phase data, so we need to run NORDIC with the same parameters in fMRIPost-Phase to get the denoised phase data, right? Assuming NORDIC actually modifies the phase data of course.
@mattcieslak had the great idea to test out the effect of NORDIC on motion parameters by simulating data with POSSUM, although he already found that MP-PCA had a large effect on dMRI motion parameters and I'm betting that extends to fMRI.
The main questions are:
Related issues/PRs: SteenMoeller/NORDIC_Raw#21, nipreps/fmriprep#3308.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: