You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
The requirement for spaCy 2.1.8 should be made more explicit (e.g., in new requirements.txt). Currently, this is only in the benchmarking requirements (e.g., requirements-benchmark.txt).
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Install pySBD with Spacy 3+ already installed.
Expected behavior
Installation fails due to conflict with spaCy version.
Additional context
The version of spaCy should be listed in requirements.txt, so that this is caught during initial installation (instead of later on when running the benchmark).
At the very least, this should be mentioned in the README file.
Note: Although a fix for spaCy 3+ has been developed (see pull #97), making the requirements explicit is still important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
The requirement for spaCy 2.1.8 should be made more explicit (e.g., in new requirements.txt). Currently, this is only in the benchmarking requirements (e.g., requirements-benchmark.txt).
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Install pySBD with Spacy 3+ already installed.
Expected behavior
Installation fails due to conflict with spaCy version.
Additional context
The version of spaCy should be listed in requirements.txt, so that this is caught during initial installation (instead of later on when running the benchmark).
At the very least, this should be mentioned in the README file.
Note: Although a fix for spaCy 3+ has been developed (see pull #97), making the requirements explicit is still important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: