You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
to re-trained the model myself. By evaluating the last checkpoint (iteration=500k), I got the performance:
However, the PA-MPJPE reported in the Table 1 of the paper is 41.2, which is lower than 42.8 as I got. Moreover, the evaluation from the given data/checkpoint.pt is
which is actually better than the reported number and thus shows a larger gap with my re-trained weights.
Have I missed any details here to reproduce the performance reported in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the good job.
I tried to run:
to re-trained the model myself. By evaluating the last checkpoint (iteration=500k), I got the performance:
However, the PA-MPJPE reported in the Table 1 of the paper is 41.2, which is lower than 42.8 as I got. Moreover, the evaluation from the given data/checkpoint.pt is
which is actually better than the reported number and thus shows a larger gap with my re-trained weights.
Have I missed any details here to reproduce the performance reported in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: