Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NJU2k missing 100 samples? #3

Open
fereenwong opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

NJU2k missing 100 samples? #3

fereenwong opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@fereenwong
Copy link

hi, thanks for sharing the great work.
I download the provided dataset, RGBdDataset_processed. In which, the NJU2K dataset contains 1400/485 samples in trainset/testset folds, 1885 samples in total. Are there missing 100 samples? (As noted in the paper, NJUD includes 1985 samples.)

@nnizhang
Copy link
Owner

nnizhang commented Aug 2, 2020

For fair comparisons, we adopt the same trainset and test set as in [1] for the NJU2K dataset.
As described in [1], the authors sample 100 images for the validation set and 1400/485 for the trainset/test set from the NJU2K dataset.

[1] Hao Chen and Youfu Li. Progressively complementarity-aware fusion network for rgb-d salient object detection. In
CVPR, pages 3051–3060, 2018.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants