Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build WG meeting 2016-06-28 #438

Closed
orangemocha opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 14 comments
Closed

Build WG meeting 2016-06-28 #438

orangemocha opened this issue Jun 16, 2016 · 14 comments

Comments

@orangemocha
Copy link

orangemocha commented Jun 16, 2016

Meeting Time: 8PM Tuesday June 28th UTC, or in your local timezone:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Node.js+Foundation+Build+WG+Meeting&iso=20160628T20&p1=%3A

Where

Agenda

Extracted from wg-agenda issues and pull requests from this repo.

If there are any items that you would like to discuss at the meeting, please tag new or existing issues with the wg-agenda label, or simply post them in a comment here.

All welcome of course, primarily @nodejs/build focused but we're happy to expand.

@orangemocha
Copy link
Author

I am going to be on vacation from June 20th to June 30th, so I won't be able to attend this one. Perhaps @mhdawson or @jbergstroem can facilitate?

Note that the meeting is scheduled for June 28th. I posted the issue with more advance notice than usual

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jun 16, 2016

I'm happy to facilitate, @jbergstroem unless you want to do it I'll go ahead and create the hangouts etc.

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

I'm not quite sure on my whereabouts either. Can hopefully attend but I will know next week.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Added hangouts/youtube links

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

I won't make it. Sorry. I'll try to update issues tomorrow with updates.

@williamkapke
Copy link

Hey @nodejs/build - I hope everyone got a chance to review #404 for the meeting today. It is the foundation of many tasks I'm passionately wanting to pursue.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@williamkapke we are pretty small group in the WG meeting this week as quite a few people are away on vacation. I can see the specific action you'd like is whether the build WG can include the work to manage the bots. @jbergstroem what's your take on that based on the discussions you've had so far ? I feel like we don't want to just defer until the next meeting with William is waiting on a answer to know how to proceed. I'm not sure when everybody is back from vacation but maybe we can try to find a time to discuss this specific issue. I'll try to ping people next week to see if we have enough people back to find a time to set something up.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

PR for meeting minutes: #443

@williamkapke
Copy link

Thank you for the update @mhdawson. I am a big fan of taking a little of something rather than all of nothing. So I'm hoping just this WG can start with:

  1. decide on whether the WG feels it is within their domain (or is even interested) in taking on this responsibility
  2. a run down of thoughts on the "What are the next steps needed?" section I posted here: Run and deploy nodejs-github-bot #404 (comment)

I am, unfortunately, a 1 man effort on the org automation parts and it isn't a flashy project- so it isn't a priority for many. So, I very much appreciate the effort to move this forward.

My hope was to complete some of the org automation tasks and try to schedule some talks later this year to show them off- but I don't think that timeline will workout for that. Instead, I think I may need to try to use the time to collaborate face-to-face with anyone that will help.

I will be at CascadiaFest, Node Summit, Node Interactive EU and US + Collaborator Summits, NodeConf EU... and more if anyone is interested.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jul 5, 2016

Minutes landed here: #443

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jul 8, 2016

@williamkapke have talked to @jbergstroem and he had a few ideas to pursue before getting back to you, don't think it will be too much longer.

@williamkapke
Copy link

@mhdawson Thank you for the update!

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

The plan is to get @phillipj on board and have him set it up!

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

Ok I think I can close this now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants