Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Write an audit log #4

Closed
jbergstroem opened this issue Apr 4, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Write an audit log #4

jbergstroem opened this issue Apr 4, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

Write a log of all commits, opening/closing pr's, etc so we can track whether malicious commits or force pushes were made in case of an incident.

@williamkapke
Copy link
Contributor

👍 This is something I was really pondering. Also- public visibility? I would lean towards yes- but I guess it depends on what is logged. For an example, see the thoughts here: nodejs/inclusivity#85 (comment)

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member Author

I agree with public visibility when we've had the chance to look at output ourselves. This would involve things like changes to memberships too. We likely need to look at all data and draw a line.

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member Author

As for making this persistent I guess the choice lies with the person that opens the PR, but personally I'd be keen on using postgres over stuff like mongodb.

@phillipj
Copy link
Member

+1 for postgres. Worth mentioning I think the most important thing is how easy and well suited the db is for querying for insights later, not necessarily if it's easy to insert data.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jul 22, 2024

This is more than 8 years idle and we've gotten by with the GitHub audit log, so I'm going to close this. But if someone feels like it should remain open or is interested in doing the work, please re-open, comment, or open a new issue.

@Trott Trott closed this as completed Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants