Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.

Membership vetting process #39

Closed
zkat opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Membership vetting process #39

zkat opened this issue Nov 18, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@zkat
Copy link
Contributor

zkat commented Nov 18, 2015

We should at least start talking about strategies for vetting new members into this WG. I think we may need to hash out some specifics in re goals before we can fully figure this out, as well as have some understanding of existing Foundation processes for this.

Also noting in particular the private and public parts of this WG and potential distinctions to be made in the process (should there be two types of membership, etc)

@zkat
Copy link
Contributor Author

zkat commented Nov 18, 2015

Ahh, it was in a PR. Crosslinking to #32, since @nebrius had an initial version of this (though we should still limit discussion to the meeting)

@ashleygwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

closing as duplicate #11

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants