Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Loaders Team Meeting 2021-09-28 #34

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Sep 24, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Node.js Loaders Team Meeting 2021-09-28 #34

mhdawson opened this issue Sep 24, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Sep 24, 2021

Time

UTC Tue 28-Sep-2021 17:00 (05:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Tue 28-Sep-2021 10:00 (10:00 AM)
US / Mountain Tue 28-Sep-2021 11:00 (11:00 AM)
US / Central Tue 28-Sep-2021 12:00 (12:00 PM)
US / Eastern Tue 28-Sep-2021 13:00 (01:00 PM)
EU / Western Tue 28-Sep-2021 18:00 (06:00 PM)
EU / Central Tue 28-Sep-2021 19:00 (07:00 PM)
EU / Eastern Tue 28-Sep-2021 20:00 (08:00 PM)
Moscow Tue 28-Sep-2021 20:00 (08:00 PM)
Chennai Tue 28-Sep-2021 22:30 (10:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 29-Sep-2021 01:00 (01:00 AM)
Tokyo Wed 29-Sep-2021 02:00 (02:00 AM)
Sydney Wed 29-Sep-2021 03:00 (03:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from loaders-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • module: ESM loader approach #36954

Invited

  • Loaders team: @nodejs/loaders

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with loaders-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Sep 24, 2021
@GeoffreyBooth
Copy link
Member

Removing #26 and #28 as we just discussed those in this week’s ad hoc meeting. Please let me know if there’s more to discuss so soon; I’m assuming we should revisit those once the design docs proposed in the last meeting have landed or gotten significant review.

@JakobJingleheimer
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants