Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: check last fast-track request comment #606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

fix: check last fast-track request comment #606

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022

Conversation

Mesteery
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #606 (98499c0) into main (919ec3b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #606   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.10%   84.10%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        4051     4051           
=======================================
  Hits         3407     3407           
  Misses        644      644
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/pr_checker.js 98.44% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 919ec3b...98499c0. Read the comment docs.

@targos targos merged commit 19ddfb6 into nodejs:main Apr 25, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2022
Merged
@Mesteery Mesteery deleted the check-last-fast-track-commemnt branch April 26, 2022 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aduh95 aduh95 aduh95 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Mesteery @aduh95 @targos