-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
doc, meta: organize contributing to Node-API guide
PR-URL: #53243 Reviewed-By: Gabriel Schulhof <gabrielschulhof@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
1c0b89b
commit 0354584
Showing
1 changed file
with
47 additions
and
61 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,66 +1,52 @@ | ||
# Contributing a new API to Node-API | ||
|
||
Node-API is the next-generation ABI-stable API for native addons. | ||
While improving the API surface is encouraged and welcomed, the following are | ||
a set of principles and guidelines to keep in mind while adding a new | ||
Node-API. | ||
Node-API is the ABI-stable API for native addons. We encourage contributions to enhance the API, | ||
while also ensuring compatibility and adherence to guidelines. When adding a new API to Node-API, | ||
please follow these principles and guidelines: | ||
|
||
* A new API **must** adhere to Node-API API shape and spirit. | ||
* **Must** be a C API. | ||
* **Must** not throw exceptions. | ||
* **Must** return `napi_status`. | ||
* **Should** consume `napi_env`. | ||
* **Must** operate only on primitive data types, pointers to primitive | ||
data types or opaque handles. | ||
* **Must** be a necessary API and not a nice to have. Convenience APIs | ||
belong in node-addon-api. | ||
* **Must** not change the signature of an existing Node-API API or break | ||
ABI compatibility with other versions of Node.js. | ||
* New API **should** be agnostic towards the underlying JavaScript VM. | ||
* New API PRs **must** have a corresponding documentation update. | ||
* New API PRs **must** be tagged as **node-api**. | ||
* There **must** be at least one test case showing how to use the API. | ||
* There **should** be at least one test case per interesting use of the API. | ||
* There **should** be a sample provided that operates in a realistic way | ||
(operating how a real addon would be written). | ||
* A new API **should** be discussed at the Node-API team meeting. | ||
* A new API addition **must** be signed off by at least two members of | ||
the Node-API team. | ||
* A new API addition **should** be simultaneously implemented in at least | ||
one other VM implementation of Node.js. | ||
* A new API **must** be considered experimental for at least one minor | ||
version release of Node.js before it can be considered for promotion out | ||
of experimental. | ||
* Experimental APIs **must** be documented as such. | ||
* Experimental APIs **must** require an explicit compile-time flag | ||
(`#define`) to be set to opt-in. | ||
* A feature flag of the form `NODE_API_EXPERIMENTAL_HAS_<FEATURE>` **must** | ||
be added with each experimental feature in order to allow code to | ||
distinguish between experimental features as present in one version of | ||
Node.js versus another. | ||
* Experimental APIs **must** be considered for backport. | ||
* Experimental status exit criteria **must** involve at least the | ||
following: | ||
* A new PR **must** be opened in `nodejs/node` to remove experimental | ||
status. This PR **must** be tagged as **node-api** and **semver-minor**. | ||
* Exiting an API from experimental **must** be signed off by the team. | ||
* If a backport is merited, an API **must** have a down-level | ||
implementation. | ||
* The API **should** be used by a published real-world module. Use of | ||
the API by a real-world published module will contribute favorably | ||
to the decision to take an API out of experimental status. | ||
* The API **must** be implemented in a Node.js implementation with an | ||
alternate VM. | ||
## Core principles | ||
|
||
Since the adoption of the policy whereby moving to a later version of Node-API | ||
from an earlier version may entail rework of existing code, it is possible to | ||
introduce modifications to already-released Node-APIs, as long as the | ||
modifications affect neither the ABI nor the API of earlier versions. Such | ||
modifications **must** be accompanied by an opt-out flag. This provides add-on | ||
maintainers who take advantage of the initial compile-time flag to track | ||
impending changes to Node-API with | ||
1. **Adherence to Node-API standards** | ||
* **Must** be a C API. | ||
* **Must** not throw exceptions. | ||
* **Must** return `napi_status`. | ||
* **Should** consume `napi_env`. | ||
* **Must** operate on primitive data types, pointers to primitive data types, or opaque handles. | ||
* **Must** be a necessary API, not a convenience API (which belongs in node-addon-api). | ||
* **Must** not break ABI compatibility with other Node.js versions. | ||
|
||
* a quick fix to the breakage caused, | ||
* a notification that such breakage is impending, and thus | ||
* a buffer to adoption above and beyond the one provided by the initial | ||
compile-time flag. | ||
2. **Maintaining VM agnosticism** | ||
* New APIs **should** be compatible with various JavaScript VMs. | ||
|
||
## Documentation and testing | ||
|
||
1. **Documentation** | ||
* PRs introducing new APIs **must** include corresponding documentation updates. | ||
* Experimental APIs **must** be clearly documented as experimental and require an explicit compile-time flag | ||
to opt-in (`#define`). | ||
|
||
2. **Testing** | ||
* PRs **must** include at least one test case demonstrating API usage. | ||
* **Should** include test cases for various interesting uses of the API. | ||
* **Should** provide a sample demonstrating realistic usage, similar to a real-world addon. | ||
|
||
## Process and approval | ||
|
||
1. **Team discussion** | ||
* New APIs **should** be discussed in a Node-API team meeting. | ||
|
||
2. **Review and approval** | ||
* A new API addition **must** be signed off by at least two Node-API team members. | ||
* **Should** be implemented in at least one other VM implementation of Node.js. | ||
|
||
3. **Experimental phase** | ||
* New APIs **must** be marked as experimental for at least one minor Node.js release before promotion. | ||
* **Must** have a feature flag (`NODE_API_EXPERIMENTAL_HAS_<FEATURE>`) for distinguishing experimental | ||
feature existence. | ||
* **Must** be considered for backporting. | ||
* Exit criteria from experimental status include: | ||
* Opening a PR in `nodejs/node` to remove experimental status, tagged as **node-api** and **semver-minor**. | ||
* Approval by the Node-API team. | ||
* Availability of a down-level implementation if backporting is needed. | ||
* Usage by a published real-world module. | ||
* Implementation in an alternative VM. |