-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dynamic Modules Development in Node.js #24894
Comments
vsemozhetbyt
added
esm
Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation.
module
Issues and PRs related to the module subsystem.
labels
Dec 7, 2018
@nodejs/modules @nodejs/v8 |
MylesBorins
added
the
modules-agenda
Issues and PRs to discuss during the meetings of the Modules team.
label
Dec 10, 2018
I'm not a fan of making |
MylesBorins
removed
the
modules-agenda
Issues and PRs to discuss during the meetings of the Modules team.
label
Feb 13, 2019
This was referenced Feb 20, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I wanted to just provide a brief update on the status of the dynamic modules specification in Node.js - https://github.com/nodejs/dynamic-modules.
This proposal is designed to support the use case of named exports from CommonJS when importing them from ES Modules:
The proposal is moving to final review stages with the details now all worked out as an ECMA-262 patch (tc39/ecma262#1306), Node.js specification (https://nodejs.github.io/dynamic-modules/) and v8 implementation (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1303725).
At the last Node.js modules group meeting there was consensus that the group would continue to support this work going forward. That does not mean that we will definitely use this approach in Node.js, but that we as a group are committed to continuing to develop this work as a viable path forward as we make the various decisions around ES modules interop.
It's important for TC39 and v8 to know that this is a proposal with the collective support of Node.js as a project, so I'm creating this issue to get wider feedback from everyone involved.
If anyone has any questions or concerns about the approach, or Node.js advocating this work further, please do let us know here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: