Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 20, 2022. It is now read-only.

Node.js Internationalization Proposal #132

Open
obensource opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Node.js Internationalization Proposal #132

obensource opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@obensource
Copy link
Member

Hi there!

On behalf of the Node.js Community Committee, I’d like to thank you for your group’s contributions to this awesome project! 👏👏👏

I’m reaching out as a member of our new Internationalization Working Group, and we’d like to get in touch with you about our proposal around Internationalization for Node.js!

Our proposed changes would modify the structure of the working model that your group, and all Node.js Localization groups currently observe. The primary difference being that we’d like to introduce a new translation platform to streamline the translation process and setup automated integration of localization into the Node.js project.

If you haven’t seen it already, we’d greatly appreciate if you could please take a moment to review our new proposal and comment in this issue to let us know if you have any thoughts, questions, or objections to it.

We’d love to hear from you by February 14th, during our consensus seeking period for this proposal. If we’re not able to hear from you in that time, we’ll consider that your opinion of the effort is positive, and press on with it.

Moving ahead, the i18n Working Group is so thrilled to stay in touch with you and make the translation of Node.js’ content into your language a success!

We’re excited to be in touch again soon, and thank you for working with us!

@yasinaydinnet
Copy link

yasinaydinnet commented Feb 8, 2018

Medium post says it all right! Those are the points/reasons that made Node.js have different UIs and websites.

So what's the status of crowdin transation @obensource ? Is it on process or already decided and started receiving translations?

@obensource
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @yasinaydin! Happy to hear your positive feedback! 🙌

Currently we're in the consensus seeking phase of this proposal, and if the feedback is good from all the l10n groups by the 15th–then we'll be good to go to start setting up our i18n repo and your Crowdin project. Excited to be in touch about it, and feel free to reach out to me or anyone in the i18n working group if you have any questions!

Cheers! 🍻

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants