-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding collaborators, Nov 2015 #354
Comments
I have no objections. I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here? Sent from my iPhone
|
There's no real answer to this other than "more" while contributions are growing. Collaborators help with the sizable review load as we continue to gain more contributions (and we're not even near where we were on iojs.org for localizations yet). |
+1 to this. However, we need to be 100% sure they know the general rules - more specifically the merging/PR rules. In the past it's only been a few contributors added, and the older contributors were able to confirm over Issues. I'm sure you have opinions/thoughts on this, @mikeal? |
Do we want to go as far as having an onboarding? |
There's an upside and a downside to it. Upside is that everybody knows what's going on, and there will be as few mistakes as possible. Downside is that we have to put effort into it. That sounds extremely lazy, but it's the most simple way to describe it. We may not have enough/willing/able people to be able to onboard, and it will limit the rate at which we can accept new collaborators a lot. |
@bnb as for general rules - do you mean the contents of CONTRIBUTING.md? |
I contributed exactly 2 bytes, so feel free to defer any onboarding or other work for me! 👍 |
@sup Yes. |
@sup As well as GOVERNANCE.md |
@bnb i see, thanks (as though, the GOVERNANCE.md is a bit outdated, isn't it?) |
Nice @mikeal 👍 |
any progress on this? haven't heard from it in a while |
@sup I would add you, but I'm not a team maintainer (just checked). @fhemberger @snostorm or @therebelrobot, as well as @mikeal and maybe a few other Org owners can add you. I'd say we've got the +1 for at least @sup, and if anyone else from the list above expresses interest soon, we can add them too. |
@bnb I would be happy to become a collaborator as well. |
@matthewloring Okay, just need another WG member to +1 you and you're set. |
I'm not a WG member, but +1 to @matthewloring |
@bnb I'm ready to contribute to the website with you 😀 |
@bnb Sorry, I've been quite busy lately, so I wasn't able to follow all the contributions which happened in the meantime. That's why I won't participate in the voting as well. Please just let me know who wants to become a contributor and got a +1, and I'll be happy to add them. |
@bnb I want to be a collaborator! |
@fhemberger me, I suppose then |
@sup Just added you. |
@fhemberger thanks! |
I am already a part of Docker and Build working groups, so I probably don't need to become a collaborator here as well. I would like to contribute with more Docker stuff to the website however. |
@fhemberger these three was mentioned and has expressed they want to be collaborators, could you add them aswell? ..and close the issue afterwards :) |
Unfortunately, GitHub has changed their user role management. Only organization owners can send invitations for new members to join (I can only add existing org members to the website team). @Fishrock123 You're listed as owner, can you please add the new members? |
@fhemberger Invited all 3. |
Closing this since the rest didn't respond. |
Here's a list of recent contributors who are not yet collaborators. If there are no objections I'll be adding them to the Website WG.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: