Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify the meaning of supermajority in governance guide #46

Closed
yizha1 opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #74
Closed

Clarify the meaning of supermajority in governance guide #46

yizha1 opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #74
Assignees
@yizha1
Labels
Governance issues to improve governance posture

Comments

@yizha1
Copy link
Contributor

yizha1 commented Jul 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

As discussed in 07/24 community call, this issue is created to clarify the meaning of supermajority used in governance guide.

The proposal is that the supermajority used in governance guide means a two-thirds supermajority.
@yizha1 yizha1 added the Governance issues to improve governance posture label Jul 25, 2023
@yizha1 yizha1 self-assigned this Jul 25, 2023
@yizha1 yizha1 linked a pull request Apr 13, 2024 that will close this issue
chore: bring clarity to supermajority #74
Merged
@yizha1 yizha1 moved this from Todo to In Progress in Notary Project Planning Board Apr 13, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Notary Project Planning Board Apr 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@yizha1 yizha1

Labels
Governance issues to improve governance posture
Projects
Notary Project Planning Board
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

chore: bring clarity to supermajority yizha1/.github
1 participant
@yizha1