Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, I think this is a bug in our side. This also came up with evetion/SpaceLiDAR.jl#29 and I think we should fix it. I don't know if it will happen soon or ever so we better work on refactoring the result classes so they can parse at least the simple JSON flavor from CMR. The main reason I picked UMM was that it's usually more reliable and complete but as we can see here this is not always the case. @scottyhq |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm not too familiar with all the possible CMR metadata values, but am surprised when granules come back from a search without a footprint polygon. It looks like earthaccess requires umm_json:
earthaccess/earthaccess/search.py
Line 18 in 3a2d171
But it seems like that doesn't return the polygon... See for example:
curl "https://cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/granules.json?collection_concept_id=C2120512202-NSIDC_ECS&producer_granule_id\[\]=ATL03_20221012161617_03351705_005_01.h5"
versus
curl "https://cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/granules.umm_json?collection_concept_id=C2120512202-NSIDC_ECS&producer_granule_id\[\]=ATL03_20221012161617_03351705_005_01.h5"
Two questions come to mind:
earthaccess.search()
(If I know a granule name in advance)Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions