Hoping to get into upnp

[lucktu]

This will increase the rate of p2p.
https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp

Thanks!

If you have any ideas, go over here please #147

[Logan007]

Thank you for the pointer, it has already been mentioned here.

UPnP support still is an open action item and has also been discussed at #147. I therefore consider this a duplicate.

As it might become a hard-to-follow topic when wide-spread, please keep the discussion somewhat contained to one of the above mentioned. Thank you!

[lucktu]

"it might become a hard-to-follow topic when wide-spread"?

I still don’t understand what this means. Something this good should be in it.

Anyone else have an opinion?

[skyformat99]

Lightweight is the best mark for N2N, because there are so many embedded features to use.

if increase the rate of p2p, can use KCP with only two files：
https://github.com/skywind3000/kcp

[lucktu]

Lightweight is the best mark for N2N, because there are so many embedded features to use.

if increase the rate of p2p, can use KCP with only two files：
https://github.com/skywind3000/kcp

Can you put it in your repositorie(or a new pull) that let us to test?
It seems that kcp only improves the transmission quality, not increase the rate of p2p.

In addition, the size of upnpc-static is only 82KB.

[Logan007]

Something this good should be in it.

Yes, I fully agree. And I am not speaking against it.

what this means

I am just saying that we should not discuss UPnP across two or more different issues because the UPnP discussion is hard-to-follow then. Perhaps, we can discuss it at #147 or #562?

[lucktu]

Actually, it's pretty clear what that means. There's nothing to discuss.

[Logan007]

Actually, it's pretty clear what that means. There's nothing to discuss.

No, it does not mean that there is nothing to discuss.

Au contraire, I would gladly discuss how to implement UPnP support.

I just think that topics should be discussed at one place (one Issue), and not in two or more. That's all I kindly ask for... just for the sake of being able to keep and later find or retrieve information at one place... (and not at two or more).

[skyformat99]

Actually, it's pretty clear what that means. There's nothing to discuss.

No, it does not mean that there is nothing to discuss.

Au contraire, I would gladly discuss how to implement UPnP support.

I just think that topics should be discussed at one place (one Issue), and not in two or more. That's all I kindly ask for... just for the sake of being able to keep and later find or retrieve information at one place... (and not in two or more).

agree,
close it ^_^

[lucktu]

Without a post like mine as a guide, that post is nowhere to be found

If you have any ideas, go over here please #147