feat: add option for prepending (no)script to body

[pimlie]

Resolves: #370

I couldnt came up with a good single name, so I decided on pody as in prepended body.

I am happy to change this to something better, but I'd prefer to keep it to a single word so we dont have kebab/camelCase issues when switching between js object property and html attribute name.

[atinux]

Nice PR @pimlie

I don't know what to feel about pody, I would have mabe called it pbody to keep body and p for prepend.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #410 into master will decrease coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is 95.74%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #410      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage     100%   99.55%   -0.45%     
==========================================
  Files          30       31       +1     
  Lines         430      449      +19     
  Branches      125      127       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          430      447      +17     
- Misses          0        2       +2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/client/updateClientMetaInfo.js	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
src/shared/constants.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
src/utils/elements.js	100% <100%> (ø)
src/server/generators/tag.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
src/client/updaters/tag.js	96.07% <93.75%> (-3.93%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f90cd41...156d816. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #410 into master will decrease coverage by 0.44%.
The diff coverage is 95.74%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #410      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage     100%   99.55%   -0.45%     
==========================================
  Files          30       31       +1     
  Lines         430      449      +19     
  Branches      125      127       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          430      447      +17     
- Misses          0        2       +2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/client/updateClientMetaInfo.js	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
src/shared/constants.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
src/utils/elements.js	100% <100%> (ø)
src/server/generators/tag.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
src/client/updaters/tag.js	96.07% <93.75%> (-3.93%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f90cd41...dae4469. Read the comment docs.

[pimlie]

Renamed pody to pbody

[atinux]

Good for me (expect failing test 😄 )

[pimlie]

Ha, thanks for the heads-up. Getting a bit too used to failing tests due to the IE issue I guess ;)

[derz]

thanks for you work @pimlie (cc @atinux). Wouldn‘t it be nicer to extend the existing body flag and include two options for it - maybe: afterbegin and beforeend like it is used, for example, in here: https://developer.mozilla.org/de/docs/Web/API/Element/insertAdjacentHTML
We could use beforeend as the default value if it is set to true to avoid breaking changes and avoid a potential pitfall if both flags (body and pbody`) are set.

[pimlie]

@derz Thank you for your comment. I can see the logic in your suggestion. After this PR was merged I realized it would maybe also be nice to just add extra methods, so instead of calling text() you'd call meta.script.body() / meta.script.bodyAppend() vs meta.script.bodyPrepend()

But I am not strongly opinionated on the matter, so I will leave the initiative to change this API to someone else :)