-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Training to Generate Point Cloud with More Features #48
Comments
Hi! Sorry for the late reply: yes simply appending rgb values to the coordinates will work. I try this before can it can generate reasonable output with color. I use the float number for rgb (in range [0,1]). The training time is not much longer. I used the exact default hyper-parameters. |
Thank you so much! I will follow your advice and try! |
Do we have to normalize the feature, such as RGB, or not? @ZENGXH |
@ZENGXH If we add more features, should we change the |
@ZENGXH Also, do we need to change the |
|
@ZENGXH, I see. I have also noticed that you haven't normalized the dataset coordinate. But you recommend normalising the features, such as RGB. Am I right? |
Do we need to change the value of |
Oh, my apology. Actually, I saw you apply the normalization operation on the coordinate. LION/datasets/pointflow_datasets.py Line 261 in ca8129d
|
I think you dont need to change it. You could leave it as 0 and see if the running raise any error (like channel mismatched) |
I see. I just leave it as 0, and everything goes well. |
Hello, I really appreciate your great work and want to explore it more!
In the paper you mentioned that the each point can have more features than only its xyz coordinates, if I were to train this model to generate a point cloud for a more complex object, for example, an object with different colors for different parts, is it possible for me to just append the rgb values to each point's coordinates, so its now N x 6? Or should I just have multiple colors and treat them as class labels, then encode these class labels as features to append to each point? In this case do I need to re-design the loss? Would this potentially cause the training procedure to take much much longer?
Thank you so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: