We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OS I don't know how Windows behaves. In Linux, schedutil gives 5ns~10ns more than performance
x86 perf bias msr It greatly affected the result as it may affect the clock of bus. at performance it gave 40ns~. at power it gave 100ns+
nice value In my test, it doesn't affect too much
core loads. If the bus is busy(for example using graphic cards, heavy programs) the latency will higher.
some factors should the user control, others like OS can be displayed in the chart.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
OS
I don't know how Windows behaves.
In Linux, schedutil gives 5ns~10ns more than performance
x86 perf bias msr
It greatly affected the result as it may affect the clock of bus.
at performance it gave 40ns~.
at power it gave 100ns+
nice value
In my test, it doesn't affect too much
core loads.
If the bus is busy(for example using graphic cards, heavy programs) the latency will higher.
some factors should the user control, others like OS can be displayed in the chart.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: