Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL, in the sdmmc files, inverted logic? #2

Open
flatirondesigns opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@flatirondesigns
Copy link

#if !(defined(FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL) && FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL)

I could be wrong, but the sdmmc files have this logic inverted? All other files that use the FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL is inverted.

@flatirondesigns flatirondesigns changed the title Is this logic inverted? Is FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL, in the sdmmc file inverted logic? Feb 15, 2024
@flatirondesigns flatirondesigns changed the title Is FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL, in the sdmmc file inverted logic? Is FSL_SDK_ENABLE_DRIVER_CACHE_CONTROL, in the sdmmc files, inverted logic? Feb 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant