Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducibility Issues (Bias Score and Accuracy) #12

Open
rajneesh407 opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Reproducibility Issues (Bias Score and Accuracy) #12

rajneesh407 opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@rajneesh407
Copy link

I have been working on reproducing the results using the code from your repository and implementing it in Python. I successfully converted the provided R code into Python, and the outputs from both versions match. However, the results from your repository code do not align with the figures presented in your research paper.

Code used: [BBQ_calculate_bias_score.R] (https://github.com/nyu-mll/BBQ/blob/main/analysis_scripts/BBQ_calculate_bias_score.R)
Research paper link: [QA Bias Benchmark] (https://github.com/nyu-mll/BBQ/blob/main/QA_bias_benchmark.pdf)

Here is the output I obtained using the R code from your repository:

image

Comparing Dberta V3 Base (For Disambiguous):
Comparison With Paper :
- Age : Match
- Disability : Match
- Gender Identity : 13.9 (R-Code) instead of 15 (paper)
- Gender Identity Names : 12.7 instead of 14
- Nationality : Match
- Physical Appearance : 41.8 instead of 41
- Race and Ethnicity : 4.7 instead of 4.6
- Race and Ethnicity Names : Match
- Religion : Match
- Sexual Orientation : Match
- SES : Match

Same patter can be seen across other models also.

Any help/clarifications would be appreciated here. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant