Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Release] No performance benefit when using Intel-MLlib to run ALS algorithm. #48

Closed
haojinIntel opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #51
Closed

[Release] No performance benefit when using Intel-MLlib to run ALS algorithm. #48

haojinIntel opened this issue Apr 1, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #51
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@haojinIntel
Copy link
Collaborator

I run ALS algorithm with Intel-MLlib and no performance benefit obtained. The configuration of ALS.conf is showed below:
image
And the configuration of spark is showed below:
image

@haojinIntel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Component Configuration Status Succeeded Cases Failed cases Baseline time/s Optimized time/s Performance gain/% Details
oap-mllib ALS_5GB_INTEL_MLLIB SUCCEED 1 0 634.37 643.837 -1.5 Details

@haojinIntel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@xwu99 @zhixingheyi-tian Please help to tracking the issue. Thanks!

@xwu99
Copy link
Collaborator

xwu99 commented Apr 1, 2021

@haojinIntel What version are you testing? ALS is not included in 1.1.0 branch

@xwu99 xwu99 linked a pull request Apr 15, 2021 that will close this issue
@xwu99
Copy link
Collaborator

xwu99 commented Apr 15, 2021

@haojinIntel ALS was added to OAP 1.1 from #50

@xwu99 xwu99 closed this as completed Apr 15, 2021
@xwu99 xwu99 changed the title No performance benefit when using Intel-MLlib to run ALS algorithm. [Release] No performance benefit when using Intel-MLlib to run ALS algorithm. Apr 15, 2021
@zhixingheyi-tian zhixingheyi-tian added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants