Different naming of classes/methods and opcode arguments

[volodya-lombrozo]

The problem raised after the #276 implementation.
We started name all classes and methods with j$ prefix, but after, the next problem raised:

seq > @
  tuple
    com/example/B
    .new
      com/example/A 
      .new
        42
      .bar

As you can see, in the code snippet we have com/example/B and com/example/A arguments, however the corresponding classes were transformed to the following structures:

[] > j$B

and

[] > j$A

So, here we have inconsistency in naming which has to be solved