You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Discussed with @AltGr the possibility of repository triagers marking a package as broken, with a reason and a constraint. e..g broken : "needs newer clang" {os = "darwin"}
CI can use this to triage and move on - right now we need to block on doing a fix which is sometimes difficult on the spot and/or simply not possible (if a depext is missing).
I could imagine something around:
making broken packages not installable by default
having a flag to allow forcing the broken package to install (e.g. for pinning/testing a fix)
listing broken packages (so we can ask people to help fix them)
This would help us design a workflow for making it easier for external contributors to give us fixes for problems, and also for CI to semi-automatically mark packages as known-broken. The CI could also verify that broken packages are in fact still broken.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
available: false would have worked too :)
Or even available: broken, abusing the handling of undefined variables... That way you would get:
Your request can't be satisfied:
- unmet availability conditions: broken
Even available: !(broken-needs-newer-clang & os = "darwin") would work.
DISCLAIMER: I am not advising the above, just saying that it's possible. And the main point here is easier triaging and automated handling, which this hack would clearly not help with. A broken: field seems a good idea.
Discussed with @AltGr the possibility of repository triagers marking a package as broken, with a reason and a constraint. e..g
broken : "needs newer clang" {os = "darwin"}
CI can use this to triage and move on - right now we need to block on doing a fix which is sometimes difficult on the spot and/or simply not possible (if a depext is missing).
I could imagine something around:
This would help us design a workflow for making it easier for external contributors to give us fixes for problems, and also for CI to semi-automatically mark packages as known-broken. The CI could also verify that broken packages are in fact still broken.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: