You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Related to #4554 (comment), this has come up with the docker-base-images at ocaml/opam as well. If opam config report includes a git sha with the version of opam then that opam binary regards it itself as a dev version. This is problematic for hard upgrades, as these always prompt interactively on dev versions.
It's also philosophically problematic that a release tarball builds different from an otherwise identical checkout of the release tag in a git repository.
The solution: if git describe --exact reveals that this is a tag, treat it as a release (cf. the use of VERSION to do very similar, just by hand, in ocaml/ocaml)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to #4554 (comment), this has come up with the docker-base-images at ocaml/opam as well. If
opam config report
includes a git sha with the version of opam then that opam binary regards it itself as a dev version. This is problematic for hard upgrades, as these always prompt interactively on dev versions.It's also philosophically problematic that a release tarball builds different from an otherwise identical checkout of the release tag in a git repository.
The solution: if
git describe --exact
reveals that this is a tag, treat it as a release (cf. the use ofVERSION
to do very similar, just by hand, in ocaml/ocaml)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: