Bump version to 2.3.0~alpha~dev #6045
Conversation
rjbou
commented
Jun 21, 2024
•
rjbou
commented
- update tests
- Bump cli version/add cli 2.3
|
Doesn't master now become 2.3.0~dev? |
| @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ | |||
| 11ea1cb | |||
| ### OPAMYES=1 OPAMSTRICT=0 | |||
| ### OPAMVAR_arch=x86_64 OPAMVAR_os=linux OPAMVAR_os_family=arch OPAMVAR_os_distribution=archarm | |||
| ### # We need to set this version to keep the test as is | |||
| ### OPAMVAR_opam_version=2.2.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know if we should update the test (and possibly alter it?) or freeze it like that...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree it looks a bit weird, but I think it's OK - the only thing which might be worth double-checking is whether the bounds actually matter i.e. if something actually needs fixing in opam-repository? But this could be tracked in a follow-up issue/note, rather than blocking the version bump.
| @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ | |||
| 11ea1cb | |||
| ### OPAMYES=1 OPAMSTRICT=0 | |||
| ### OPAMVAR_arch=x86_64 OPAMVAR_os=linux OPAMVAR_os_family=arch OPAMVAR_os_distribution=archarm | |||
| ### # We need to set this version to keep the test as is | |||
| ### OPAMVAR_opam_version=2.2.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree it looks a bit weird, but I think it's OK - the only thing which might be worth double-checking is whether the bounds actually matter i.e. if something actually needs fixing in opam-repository? But this could be tracked in a follow-up issue/note, rather than blocking the version bump.
|
Discussed in meeting: seems that setting the |
|
Thanks! |
