-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ubuntu 22.04 / 22.10 images are missing riscv64 architecture #206
Comments
For the latest ocluster worker deployment, we went with option 1, using |
What's the "correct" thing here? Should we be using riscv64/ubuntu in general? |
i.e. is there any information on the change in support of riscv64 |
Not much apart from "this is intentional and we're talking about it to possibly bring it back later" docker-library/official-images#13950 (comment) |
I'm suggesting to use the images from riscv64/ubuntu: |
I've pushed this change, enabling the riscv64 Ubuntu images again (and the multiarch tags as well). |
@benmandrew With the 23.10 upgrade docker base images is missing RiscV support again. See https://images.ci.ocaml.org/job/2023-10-31/060912-ocluster-build-fd0e13 |
The Ubuntu build page shows that Mantic has been built successfully on riscv64 and is up-to-date: https://launchpad.net/~cloud-images-release-managers/+livefs/ubuntu/mantic/ubuntu-oci. The riscv64/ubuntu Docker page hasn't had updates in 10 months. I sent an email a few weeks ago to Steve Langasek (listed on the Launchpad page) about this but I've not had a response. I'll try contacting other members of the team, but it's a little difficult to find who's responsible. |
@mtelvers has work to address this on mtelvers#1, which PR will to target this repo soon. |
Reported by @mtelvers the Ubuntu images on docker hub are missing riscv 64 support in the latest versions. See https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu/tags?page=1&name=22.10 and https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu/tags?page=1&name=22.04.
Causing the docker pipeline to fail and our riscv based images to be out of date. Based on the scarcity of riscv hardware we are only really using the riscv hardware for building these images and for some minor testing. We could one of:
Option 1 seems reasonable for now. Other than the ocluster-worker and base-image-builder, is anyone else relying on these images? @dra27
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: