You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We differ from Numpy in the way we interpret ==. Our use case has quite limited usability, and Numpy users will be surprised by the interpretation.
Another issue that comes with this difference is our current inability to do things like x[x > 0] = 1 or so, which would be nice to have. Then, of course, == cannot be an exception.
Question: How about we change our tensors to behave like Numpy arrays in that respect?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We differ from Numpy in the way we interpret
==
. Our use case has quite limited usability, and Numpy users will be surprised by the interpretation.Another issue that comes with this difference is our current inability to do things like
x[x > 0] = 1
or so, which would be nice to have. Then, of course,==
cannot be an exception.Question: How about we change our tensors to behave like Numpy arrays in that respect?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: