displaying "-" when user type not defined #10190
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Deploy Preview for care-ohc failed.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx (2)
113-113: Consider consistent undefined value handling across the component.While this change handles falsy values for
user_type, other properties likephone_numberuse the nullish coalescing operator. Consider standardizing the approach:- {user.user_type ? user.user_type : "-"} + {user.user_type || "-"}This maintains the same functionality while being more concise.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 113-113: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
113-113: Fix indentation.The line needs two spaces of indentation to match the surrounding code style.
- {user.user_type ? user.user_type : "-"} + {user.user_type ? user.user_type : "-"}🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 113-113: Insert
··(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9080
File: src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx:55-58
Timestamp: 2024-11-14T08:22:33.858Z
Learning: In `src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx`, the `user.user_type` property is always defined for all users; therefore, functions like `CanUserAccess` do not need to handle undefined `user_type`.
🪛 eslint
src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx
[error] 113-113: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
| @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ const UserCard = ({ user }: { user: UserBase }) => { | |||
| <div> | |||
| <div className="text-gray-500">{t("role")}</div> | |||
| <div className="font-medium truncate"> | |||
| {user.user_type ?? "-"} | |||
| {user.user_type ? user.user_type : "-"} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remove unnecessary falsy value check for user_type
The type system guarantees that user_type is always defined as it's a required field in the UserBase type. The current defensive check is unnecessary and can be simplified to just {user.user_type}.
src/components/Users/UserListAndCard.tsx:113: Replace{user.user_type ? user.user_type : "-"}with{user.user_type}
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the necessity of falsy value handling for user_type.
According to previous learnings from PR #9080, user.user_type should always be defined. However, this change suggests otherwise by handling falsy values. Could you clarify if there's been a change in the data contract?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances where user_type might be undefined
rg -A 2 "user_type\s*[?:]" --type ts
Length of output: 1773
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API response handling or data transformation related to user_type
rg -A 3 "interface.*User|type.*User" --type ts
ast-grep --pattern 'interface User {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 7348
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 113-113: Insert ··
(prettier/prettier)
Returns
user.user_typeif it is truthy. Otherwise, it returns "-"Summary by CodeRabbit