You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We would like to test a scenario where DKG committee and consensus committee after recovery contain unique identities that aren't part of opposite sets. Formally speaking we have two sets A and B, we would like to have:
∣𝐴 ∖ 𝐵∣ = 1
∣𝐵 ∖ 𝐴∣ = 1
Create an integration test that reproduces next behavior:
network fails DKG in epoch 0 and enters EFM
while being in EFM node A gets ejected
operators runs a local KG having all the private keys but without node B
operator creates an epoch recovery transaction with a committee which excludes the node A and uses DKG from previous step without node B
recovery transaction gets accepted with symmetrically different sets of consensus committee and DKG committee
epoch 1 is successfully recovered
network is able to enter epoch 1
network is able to finalize blocks in epoch 1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
We would like to test a scenario where DKG committee and consensus committee after recovery contain unique identities that aren't part of opposite sets. Formally speaking we have two sets A and B, we would like to have:
Create an integration test that reproduces next behavior:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: