-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify role of publisher and definition of publisher name #420
Comments
This is a quick fix, but as it changes the description of a field, leaving for 1.2. |
Hello, I'm coming from the 1.1.4 announcement from a month ago I just read. And scrolling trough the list of issues I see that publisher is going to get a refresh and I think this might be the right spot to raise this: What do you think? |
For now, we recommend using this extension, which adds a
That way, information about the original publisher is always available. |
publisher name is currently defined as:
It would be clearer if it explicitly defined the role of the publisher, for example:
This has raised questions in a jurisdiction where the buyers are legally responsible for publishing their information to a central platform. A separate body is then responsible for outputting to OCDS.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: