Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Adding simplified evaluation methods #263

Conversation

hairyhenderson
Copy link
Contributor

This PR

  • adds new client methods Boolean, String, Float, Int, and Object that enable simpler usage (no error handling required)

Related Issues

Fixes #262

Notes

There seems to be a soft consensus on #262, so this may need to change if the TC deems necessary, but I'm submitting this early for discussion's sake.

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

See additional examples provided.

Signed-off-by: Dave Henderson <dhenderson@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@Kavindu-Dodan Kavindu-Dodan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving as I think this adds good syntatic sugar to our client API.

But please consider opinion of our TC (cc - @toddbaert @thomaspoignant @lukas-reining )

Copy link
Member

@lukas-reining lukas-reining left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed, I am in of also having an "errorless" API, as we have it in most other SDKs.
The implementation looks good to me.

Copy link
Member

@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good to me, it will simplify the usage of the SDK 🙌

@thomaspoignant thomaspoignant merged commit 7b610c7 into open-feature:main Apr 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@hairyhenderson hairyhenderson deleted the hairyhenderson/simplified-eval-methods-262 branch April 9, 2024 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Awkward usage when trying to evaluate a boolean flag in a complex conditional
4 participants