-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Refactor] use mmengine.basemodule instead of nn.module #1491
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 87.93% // Head: 88.00% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev-1.x #1491 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 87.93% 88.00% +0.07%
===========================================
Files 399 399
Lines 26059 26029 -30
Branches 4051 4039 -12
===========================================
- Hits 22914 22906 -8
+ Misses 2240 2221 -19
+ Partials 905 902 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.
Motivation
[Refactor] use mmengine.basemodule instead of nn.module
Modification
Use mmengine.basemodule instead of nn.module
Who can help? @ them here!
BC-breaking (Optional)
Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repositories?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.
Use cases (Optional)
If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.
Checklist
Before PR:
After PR: