Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Validation Loss #12308

Open
Vaaaaaalllll opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Add Validation Loss #12308

Vaaaaaalllll opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@Vaaaaaalllll
Copy link

Motivation
In the latest version (v3), validation loss has been removed, making it difficult to properly evaluate model performance. Validation loss is a crucial metric for assessing overfitting, hyperparameter tuning, and model selection. Without it, users have no straightforward way to monitor generalization performance. Removing this feature in the newer version is confusing and impacts the evaluation process.

Related Resources
If there is an official reason for its removal or alternative solutions, please provide references. Additionally, if there are third-party implementations or workarounds, sharing those would be helpful.

Additional Context
It would be greatly appreciated if validation loss could be reintroduced or an alternative method for evaluation could be officially provided. If community contributions are welcomed, I’d be happy to help with a PR.

@AreopagX
Copy link

This has caused me unnecessary pain, too! Other libraries, e.g., MMSegmentation, have removed validation losses as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants