-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 765
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
View - allow to change aggregation type #2618
Comments
As per the most recent spec, there is no ability to change temporality on a per instrument basis, so this issue is only to specify the aggregation itself, along with anything configurable for a particular aggregation. |
Removing this from the upcoming 1.4.0 milestone. This is less important, so far haven't seen any asks for this capability. |
Already support the ability to configuration for the Aggregation itself (like pick tags, change boundaries for histogram etc.) |
We would need this to correctly make it work for New Relic. In some cases counters should have last value aggregation instead of the default sum aggregation to make it work correctly when using OTLP for New relic. See their Java example: I have not found a way to do this in the .net SDK. Are there any workarounds to set the aggregations in the mean time? (Please also note that according to the SDK setting aggregation should be supported in views as an optional parameter: |
This issue was marked stale due to lack of activity and will be closed in 7 days. Commenting will instruct the bot to automatically remove the label. This bot runs once per day. |
Unstale. This is spec requirement. |
+1 on this feature request. In my scenario, I need to configure different aggregation to change instrument type like In the CHANGELOG, it mentions
With Views supporting custom aggregation, we can workaround the problem within SDK. |
Child of overall Views feature
This is to track supporting changing Aggregation type using Views. (eg: User wants to aggregate Gauge as Histogram etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: