-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dictionary of attribute names #12
Comments
I think we should compare and contrast with a good compression library? Compression is cheap and will avoid the need for this sort of complexity. |
do you know if there is compression in grpc/proto? |
@SergeyKanzhelev yes. You can use gzip and few other options. |
@tigrannajaryan are we using compression in our protocol? What do you think about this issues? I'm happy to close it if we have some note on how to gzip or why we do not want to gzip |
@tigrannajaryan assigning to you if you don't mind |
@SergeyKanzhelev thanks. I addressed this in open-telemetry/oteps#59 |
Regarding compression: OTLP uses gRPC and compression is supported out of the box. |
Will we need at some point a dictionary of standard attribute names and use indexes instead of names for the attributes collection? It may save a lot of bandwidth, but will require to change the type for now from
string
toAttributeKey
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: