Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ParaView (5.9): Constant Record Components #967

Closed
ax3l opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

ParaView (5.9): Constant Record Components #967

ax3l opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug third party third party libraries that are shipped and/or linked

Comments

@ax3l
Copy link
Member

ax3l commented Apr 14, 2021

It looks like we forgot to test reading of constant record components in the ParaView 5.9 plugin:

https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/-/blob/v5.9.0/Wrapping/Python/paraview/algorithms/openpmd.py

Example data set: openPMD/openPMD-example-datasets#14

@ax3l ax3l added bug third party third party libraries that are shipped and/or linked labels Apr 14, 2021
@ax3l ax3l self-assigned this Apr 14, 2021
@ax3l
Copy link
Member Author

ax3l commented Nov 20, 2021

Cannot find a constant record component problem right now with that data set in ParaView 5.10 RC1 using the latest iteration of the script in https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/-/merge_requests/5341, besides that we need to de-select picongpu_idProvider when loading it (#968)

But I think particle positions are a bit off in it... But fields look equally confusing. I think this is a super-small, unusually cropped LWFA sim without recognizable physics in it or so.

@ax3l ax3l closed this as completed Nov 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug third party third party libraries that are shipped and/or linked
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant