We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
/staging_projects has <entry id= and /excluded_requests has <request id=. I see no reason why this would be different - and I prefer <request/>
<entry id=
<request id=
<request/>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@coolo we have the entry to other elements too, i.e missing_reviews and broken_packages. Any strong opinion/suggestion about them?
entry
missing_reviews
broken_packages
Sorry, something went wrong.
everything reprenting a request should be request - and for broken_package entry could be fine, but then I wonder why it's
request
<missing_checks count="2"> <missing_check name="openqa:cryptlvm" state="pending" required="true"/> <missing_check name="installcheck" state="pending" required="true"/> </missing_checks>
Either it's entry there too - or it's broken_packages/broken_package
broken_packages/broken_package
Everything that is a request should be <request...>, everything that is a package should be <package...>.
<request...>
<package...>
vpereira
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
/staging_projects has
<entry id=
and /excluded_requests has<request id=
. I see no reason why this would be different - and I prefer<request/>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: